Go Back   Back Country Rebels - Forums > THE REBEL YELL > TREE HUGGER / LAND USE REPORTS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:25 PM
Wade's Avatar
Wade Wade is offline
REBEL
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boise
Posts: 8,507
Wade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLP
Wade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLPWade Offical PLP
Default Lawsuit: Snowmobiles should be treated like other OHV

This may seem innocent. But, if we get treated like ATVs and Motorcycles, you can kiss off trail riding good by. And, it will mean another reason to close things down.

BTW, Mr. Menlove is the head greenie at WildernessWildlands.org. They are filing a lawsuit to make snowmobiles be treated like summer OHV. They are hoping to get some big dollar enviros to join their lawsuit. If they win, it will effect every National Forest with snowmobiles. Make sure to visit their website and send them a nice email.

================================================== =====

Excuse me Mr. Menlove but there are plenty of non-motorized areas set aside in every national forest. There isn’t one motorized area. Every acre we use, we share!

Attack on snowmobiling

Island Park News January 12, 2012 issue

Mountain Views

Another public lands issue has surfaced. It’s against snowmobile access in national forests, and it’s not going to go away until anti-snowmobiling environmentalists have their day in court.

When the Fund for Animals filed its first lawsuit against snowmobiling in Yellowstone Park 20 years ago, many locals scoffed at the idea of an East coast group having enough power to change how a national park is managed. How wrong they were. The Fund attracted many more anti snowmobiling groups to its cause and the resulting limitations on snowmobiles have crippled winter business and recreation opportunities in Yellowstone’s gateway communities.

When it became clear that the Fund and its supporters were succeeding, they said national forests would be their next target.

The first lawsuits demanding a Yellowstone snowmobiling ban had nothing to do with emissions from the machines or noise snowmobiles make in wild places. The early suits targeted groomed trails — specifically Yellowstone’s trail grooming program that made it easy for bison to leave the park and then be killed during the Montana Department of Fish Wildlife and Parks sanctioned hunt.

The national media printed graphic, bloody photos of Yellowstone bison killed by hunters, the public was outraged, and animal rights groups were able to get the hunt stopped for many years.

The anti snowmobiling groups continued to focus on groomed trails, saying when bison leave Yellowstone on the trails, grizzly bears have less to eat in the spring, since bison weakened by Yellowstone’s harsh winters are an essential food source for bears.

Emission and noise were then added to the reasons environmentalists think snowmobiles should be banned from Yellowstone, largely because other groups had succeeded in getting motorboats and jet skis banned from California waterways because of emissions and noise.

The current Winter Wildlands Alliance (WWA) lawsuit, detailed in last week’s paper, charges that national forests have been negligent in not specifically addressing snowmobiling’s impact on quietude, air quality, and natural resources when the forests developed their travel plans. WWA, which claims 90 supporting groups, wants all forest where snowmobiling exists to redo their plans so snowmobiling is restricted and areas are set aside for nonmotorized winter recreation.

If the court agrees that the plans should address snowmobiling, the anti snowmobile groups will demand that the plans address impacts on quietude, wildlife, fish, insects, plants, soil, and air and water quality.

Trying to soften what this could mean to snowmobile access, in a DealerNews.com article last year, WWA’s executive director, Mark Menlove, is quoted as saying he does not want snowmobiles completely banned from the forest, and he even asserts that he has spent time on a snowmobile. His says WWA wants areas set aside for non-motorized winter recreation, just like there are snowmobile play areas.

People who believe in multiple use of and equitable access to public lands should pay attention to this issue. Snowmobiling will almost certainly be restricted in our national forests, although it will be hard if not impossible to cite many negative impacts snowmobiles have on natural resources — especially wildlife like bears and wolves, which are abundant in many national forests these days.

The result could be an increase is non-motorized winter tourism, but it will be slow in coming, if West Yellowstone is an example. It will most certainly have an immediate and far-reaching negative impact on the snowmobiling industry’s contributions to the local economy.

Elizabeth Laden
ipnews@mac.com

Last edited by Wade; 01-17-2012 at 10:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:31 PM
Loudpipe's Avatar
Loudpipe Loudpipe is offline
REBEL
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Posts: 5,361
Loudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from AR
Loudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from ARLoudpipe Has earned a rub and tug from AR
Default

Let em try, I'll ride wherever the Fawk I want, some god Damned group of environazis isn't gonna stop me
__________________
no sleds currently

07 X-RS, SHR860R, aftermarket this, modified that blah blah blah......sold
07 X-RS, SHR800R.....sold
06 summit-X, SHR 800HO, big wheels, big track, still not fast.....sold

2005 CR500AF, ported, polished, and built by me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:26 PM
Mule's Avatar
Mule Mule is offline
"bcr forum security services"
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: DM79LN
Posts: 29,320
Mule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLP
Mule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLPMule Offical PLP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loudpipe View Post
Let em try, I'll ride wherever the Fawk I want, some god Damned group of environazis isn't gonna stop me
Yep. That sorta thing may work where there isn't any off-trail riding... in teh west? Fck 'em, i'm riding.
__________________
Crazy, not stupid | "Helmets make it hard to hear natural selection calling."
N* WebChat on irc://irc.nightstar.net/#snowmobiling
#155 | Mule's Photos | BackCountryRebels | ThumperTalk | Tekrider | TylersBA
I am a Snowmobiler!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:27 PM
REBEL's Avatar
REBEL REBEL is offline
Is that a fat guy joke?
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SODAK
Posts: 1,931
REBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from AR
REBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from ARREBEL Has earned a rub and tug from AR
Default




Why can't we just shoot these people and get on with life
__________________
Thanks for checking out BCR. Pm me for any questions/comments you might have about the site.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:42 PM
msled's Avatar
msled msled is offline
REBEL
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 97417N - 117.42833W
Posts: 111,074
msled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLP
msled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLPmsled Offical PLP
Default

As a last resort Rebel, we may just have to.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Back Country Rebels - Forums > THE REBEL YELL > TREE HUGGER / LAND USE REPORTS

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Managed by wDa @ WD ™

Designed by Military Ltd